首页> 外文OA文献 >Legal Opinion: The Right to Property from a Human Rights Perspective
【2h】

Legal Opinion: The Right to Property from a Human Rights Perspective

机译:法律意见:从人权角度看财产权

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The concept of property rights is often associated with commercial rights protecting corporate ownership of goods, land, or scientific innovation. However this narrow reading obscures the importance of the right to property as a human right and the social function of property as a dimension of other human rights including the human rights to food, housing and social security.The legal opinion was commissioned by Rights & Democracy and written by Dr. Christophe Golay and Ms. Ioana Cismas at the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. It compiles and comments upon existing instruments and jurisprudence at the international, regional and national levels. The authors conclude that the human right to property has two main components: on one hand it is essential for the protection of human life and dignity, and on the other hand it may be limited in order to resolve social injustices and advance the human rights of specific disadvantaged individuals or groups.The legal opinion will be of interest to academics and human rights activists working on questions related to access to land, the right to food and the right to housing as well as foreign investment and the activities of transnational corporations.
机译:产权概念通常与保护企业对商品,土地或科学创新的所有权的商业权利相关。然而,这种狭义的解释掩盖了财产权作为一项人权的重要性以及财产的社会功能作为其他人权(包括食物,住房和社会保障的人权)的一部分的重要性。法律意见是由权利与民主委托的由日内瓦国际人道法与人权学院的Christophe Golay博士和Ioana Cismas女士撰写。它对国际,区域和国家各级的现有文书和判例进行汇编和评论。作者得出的结论是,财产权的人权有两个主要组成部分:一方面,它对于保护人类生命和尊严至关重要;另一方面,它可能受到限制,以解决社会不公正现象并增进人权。从事与土地获取,食物权和住房权以及外国投资和跨国公司的活动有关的问题的学者和人权活动家将对法律意见感兴趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号